27 June 2011
iPad/Pod/Phone as ereader: No, no, not for me
There’s some debate about whether the iPad/Pod/Phone should be considered an ereader. I do not consider it such and it’s likely I never will. Here is an experience I had that demonstrates why.
On my way to work, standing on the train platform, I wanted to read a book I’d bought and downloaded some time ago. I took out my iPhone, launched my Kobo app and started to read. But I couldn’t get more than three pages without it crashing back to the home screen. I checked the App Store and there was an update to this app. I tried to update the app, but it informed me I was logged into the wrong App Store account. I went into my iPhone settings, logged out, logged back in again, and tried to update the app again.
This time it said I had to agree to new iTunes terms and conditions to continue. Leaving aside that I had at no point done anything with iTunes, I grudgingly clicked Okay (because there was no other button to press.) By this time I was on the train, we went through a tunnel and it timed out before I could agree. I tried again, and was able to approve the conditions. I tried to update the app for the third time, and when the train stopped moving it found enough 3G to download the update. It lagged a bit during the install, but finally it was done.
I launched the app again. Due to the update it had logged me out of my Kobo account. I was able to log in, but it had deleted all my purchased books and I had to download them again. When I did that and clicked on the book I’d wanted to read, it took me to the last page of the chapter I’d been reading. That read (by accident) I flipped back through the pages to find where I’d been.
By this point I’d arrived at work. I’d logged in to a few accounts, downloaded an update, re-downloaded books, and agreed to a hell of a lot of terms and conditions. And what I hadn’t done was read the bloody book, even though it was apparently all set up to read before I started.
Some people might say this is all the fault of the Kobo app, and it’s true that if it hadn’t been buggy I would have been reading for an hour rather than battling my iPhone. But it wasn’t just that app (designed by a company who have their own dedicated ereader.) It was the combination of long processes of many applications and operating systems working (and not working) together to verify and antagonize me into frustration. None of it had anything to do with reading. I was connected to the internet more often than not, to read a book I’d already downloaded.
The iPad/Pod/Phone allows you to read ebooks, but as a bonus rather than its main function. Its lack of dedication to the process means that to me it is a gadget that also reads ebooks, rather than an ereader. And that’s not likely to change.
Photos: The New Reading by Dave Walker, and #3/100 by northnorthwest (me) on flickr
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


Heh, this reads like the ultimate anti-endorsement of the iPad.
ReplyDeleteOne nice things about gadgets that do one thing really well is that they do that one thing really well. Like my Kindle has other features besides ebook reading, but it's the ebook reader that's the main function, and it doesn't try to be too many things at once.
You said it: doing one thing well makes up for a lot. I don't really mean to badmouth the iPad, and I really enjoy my iPhone, but as far as ereading it misses the mark.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with you. The iPad/pod/phone might be good for a lot of things, but e-reading is not one of them. Although my hubby does like his Kindle app on the iPad, I'd much rather use my Kindle. The back lighting alone is a turn off for me.
ReplyDeleteThe back lighting turns a lot of people off. It doesn't bother me so much since I'd usually read with my iPhone on a commute for a short time (and it helps when the tube lights randomly turn off!) but for a regular reading session without eye strain, yes--not ideal.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Laurita, the backlighting for me is the main turn off. I might read blogs off my phone, but nothing longer than that, and even some longer posts I prefer to email to my Kindle.
ReplyDeleteLOL. I used to work for At&t customer service...I vowed never to own an Iphone/pod/pad. I still have nightmares from troubleshooting them.
ReplyDeleteYou have my sympathies. :)
I am very pleased to have my decision to not buy an iphone in lieu of a dedicated e-reader affirmed. Thanks! (It's so good to read your techie-type posts again every so often. What would I do without you as my personal buying guide?)
ReplyDeletep.s. Though not e-reader related per se (though each is able to be purchased for an e-reader), I am excited to see your bookstore. Nicely done! I can't wait to read the next additions. (Novels by Jen Brubacher, novels by Jen Brubacher!)
For the record I actually quite like my iPhone... when it's doing what I want it to do. ;)
ReplyDeleteThanks Ev! It's modest so far but it's nice to have one.
My main complaint with Apple is how they wrap you up in interwoven products and terms of service. iTunes TOS to use your iPhone as an ereader. That is ridiculous.
ReplyDelete~jon
I think you hit the nail on the head when you said it was the "lack of dedication to the process" ... That said, some apps are just plain crap and I suspect that they may get better designed. I have no real complaints about the Kindle app or the Ibook platform.
ReplyDeleteGreat post!
Wow, what a stinker of an experience. Pretty damning on the thing as a reader before you could even get it to let you read.
ReplyDeleteI'm in the midst of buying an e-reader... needless to say I won't even be tempted by this ipad device:)
ReplyDeleteJon, it is ridiculous. I've always said that the iPhone is one of the least Mac-type Mac things around. I adore OSX, but with the iPhone they abandoned what made the company great.
ReplyDeleteI have an iPad (my officemate convinced me of it's virtues as a way of highlighting and simple markup of manuscripts), but it makes an awful e-reader in my opinion. Most of that is due to the screen which can't be read in direct sunlight. OTOH, e-ink displays don't work too well in below-freezing temperatures. (Don't ask why I was reading outdoors in Stockholm in February.)
ReplyDeleteTrue AidenF--and reading my Sony Reader in direct sunlight on holiday (so very hot sunlight) it started to go a bit fadey and I turned it off so it didn't have permanent damage. Technology just hasn't quite become indestructible yet.
ReplyDelete